Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Monday, October 31, 2011

Google is Becoming Microsoft Starting with the New Google Reader

Google updated their Google Reader interface today, and I was really disappointed with it.

I remember I was extremely disappointed 10 years ago, after installing Windows ME on my Windows 98 PC. After paying $60+ of my hard-earned money, only I realized that my PC ran slower with more useless features offered by Microsoft. In that era, Microsoft was a monopoly. I was not as angry with Microsoft as people at Netscape were, however, I was sometimes annoyed when Microsoft took every possible opportunity to "stir" their users stay with their software - things like Internet Explore and Microsoft Office.

I feel Google is now doing the same thing. I wouldn't mind as long as they keep their products innovated. However, I feel they're following the same pattern as Microsoft did - less innovation, more bad products, and tighter controls or less choices for the user.

I suppose Larry Page got some good advises from the legendary Steve Jobs, before he passed away. One of the best managing traits for business of Steve Jobs is that he can stay focused - he carefully chose the top priority projects that Apple should work on, and he made sure to execute. I feel Google is doing the same thing. Shortly after Page replaced Schmidt, he killed many dangling Google products (one of them was Google Desktop Search) and attempted to consolidate the rest and shift them towards Google's "social network" solution competing Facebook, the Google Plus. The PROBLEM is, along the way of this consolidation, Google did not bring out any innovation - they products are remained with the same set of features (or less), and they're turning less user friendly.

Take Google Reader for example - have you seen the new interface yet? It sucks. The previous Google Reader interface used blue and gray for distinguishing unread items - new items are well highlighted in color, and this makes the page simple, colorful and easy for navigation. The new Google Reader interface, on the contrary, has 3 fundamental design issues.

First, the interface wastes valuable space. Take a look at the following snapshot, the "A look at what's new in your Reader" logo is taking 3 rows of space! Combing it with the search bar, and the tabs for my browser, the user looses about one fifth of the screen size on a 14" laptop monitor.





Second, the navigation panel's color scheme is boring. Google is very much an engineering-driven company. With all due respect to the talents, they just don't have much marketing sense. This is why I, and many other people like Apple products. (No, I do not consider myself an Apple fanboy. I try to speak an objective opinion from the user's perspective.) Apple truly integrate technology intuitively - their product interfaces are welcoming. Google's product interfaces are typically simple - even Android. They can either be elegant or extremely boring, like the new Google Reader.




Third, again, color scheme. However, this is sever because it impacts my reading experiences. Take a look at the following picture - I have one unread item, but I cannot distinguish it from the rest because, well the BLACK looks very similar a DARK GRAY (as oppose to blue vs. gray in the previous interface). Seriously Google, are you assuming your customers are all color blinded?!





It's even more sad that I just spend 30min to write my rant. That's because I liked Google's products and enjoyed using them. As Google is turning into a new Microsoft, its arrogant would never allow it to care an end user like me. I lost Google Desktop Search not long ago, and I now just have to start looking for an alternative RSS reader.





Thursday, August 25, 2011

Acer Chairman is Wrong - Tablet is Here to Stay and Prosper

According to DigiTimes, Acer chairman JT Wang believes "tablet PC fever" is "cool down". When this story was reported by Slashdot, it was called "Acer CEO Declares a Tablets Bubble". I think Acer's chairman is dead wrong.

I talked that HP made a fatal mistake when the company decided to enter the tablet market. The situation is perhaps better in the Android world because most of other tablet OEMs adapt Google's tablet OS. The combined mass creates a comparable Apps developer community to Apple's. However, just because HP decided to quit the tablet market, it does not imply that the consumer no longer need tablets. And certainly, there is no "tablet bubble"!

Looking at Apple's iPad sales in quantity, the numbers grew quarter by quarter and year by year. Apple is projected to sell 30Mu iPad in 2H'11. There are many out there waiting for the iPad 3 coming with higher resolution, from existing iPad and iPad 2 owners, as well as those "I don't have an iPad" consumers. I believe consumers love and want to buy tablets, at the right price and with iPad-comparable performances. The reason I say so is because in the tablet market, there is only one player dominating with huge profits, Apple. That says market demand is larger than supply, and competitions cannot keep up.

Apple basically caught their competitions by surprise. No one knew Apple worked on the product for several years. After iPad was released, Apple's competitors scramble to follow, but they had much less time for both the hardware and software development. In combination, the final products are offered at comparable prices to the iPad, but with sluggish software performance. Just because the PC OEMs cannot compete, it doesn't mean there is a "bubble". Nobody is throwing money away like crazy as in a true "bubble" situation. And for those who can deliver a tablet fitting consumer needs, there is still plenty of money to be made.

I believe in the next a couple of years, we should see strong contenders to Apple's iPad (3?). I think that pack would be led by a Nokia-made tablet running Windows 8 and a Motorola Mobile-made tablet running Android. For the rest, Samsung, hTC, LG, Asus and even Acer, they should either quit tablet and stay with PC, or become much better in their designs. Just don't call it a "bubble".

Monday, September 22, 2008

Update 2 - Microsoft's new Wireless "Blue Track" Explorer Mini Mouse Tear Down

Following up with my previous update on Microsoft's new Wireless "Blue Track" Explorer Mini Mouse, and Maximum PC's interview with Microsoft's Platform Engineering Manager, FCC reviewed the tear down pictures of this mouse with more details.

Here are the pictures and click on them to see the full size:


Unfortunately, the sensor portion was not fully exposed to see the new Blue LED structure in details.





Thursday, August 28, 2008

Microsoft's new Wireless "Blue Track" Explorer Mini Mouse


Microsoft recently put up a teaser marketing claim "Say Goodbye to Laser" on their PC hardware website. Soon enough, geeks around the world started digging, and they found out that in fact Microsoft was about to release a new wireless Blue LED Mouse on 09.09.2008.

However, little was known how this "Blue LED" suppose to work and why it would be "Say Goodbye to Laser". Although speculations claim that the new system ("a little blue H.A.L. with wide angle sensor") is suppose to work on more surfaces than laser, which is the exact reason that Laser tracking is becoming a popular trend in PC mouse applications, it is yet to be proven.

With some knowledge in wireless PC peripheral applications, I started digging online to search this mouse's BOM and systems. With a little bit luck, I was able to find out the following:

- This mouse will be called "Microsoft Explorer Mini Mouse", Model Number 1363;
- This is a 2.4GHz wireless mouse. The RF radio comes from Nordic Semiconductor's nRF24L01;
- The entire system will be assembled at a Taiwanese PC peripheral ODM (original design manufacturer) called KYE;
- The Blue LED is a standard LED product from Rohm;
- Most importantly, the LED sensor came from Infineon! The Marketing Part Number (MPN) is UAB-M9659-OLQFN-76-1, but I could not find any information about this part. This must be a custom job done by Infineon for Microsoft;
- Of course, Microsoft made own firmware.

A little bit strange though, I did not find what microcontroller (MCU) was used to control the mouse. Nordic's nRF24L01 is only a 2.4GHz RF transceiver, and it does not has an integrated MCU, unless it is integrated in the Infineon optical sensor.

So that's about it so far, I hope this is a bit helpful to some geeky engineers who would like to find out the details of this product. More to come if I have more information. Otherwise, we will have to wait until 9/9/2008 and disassemble a brand new mouse to find out Microsoft's secret!

Monday, May 19, 2008

Microsoft's Steve Ballmer egged in Budapest - literally

I don't know what to comment - not sure if the hate comes from Microsoft as a corporation or Windows Vista as a not-so-user-friendly product.

See the video below and give your thoughts.